Assessment of Health Workers' Knowledge, Perception and Compliance Following a World Health Organisation Multimodal Hand Hygiene Intervention Campaign an a Nigerian Teaching Hospital
Keywords:
hand hygiene, health workersAbstract
Background: The transmission of health care-associated infections (HCAI) in hospital environment constitutes a significant major public health problem worldwide and health-care workers are potential source of these infections. This study assessed the knowledge and perception of health workers in a Nigeria Teaching Hospital following the implementation of the World Health Organization (WHO) hand hygiene intervention strategy.
Methods: The study participants were physicians, nurses and other health workers involved in direct patient care. The intervention included training/education; use of reminders in the workplace; and introduction of 70% isopropyl alcohol hand rub in strategic 'points of care' places. The WHO hand hygiene evaluation and feedback tool was used for the assessment of the health workers perception.
Results: A total of 71 (65.7 %) out of 110 respondents participated in the hand hygiene training conducted during the period of the study; however only 58 of the respondents (53.7 %) routinely use alcohol-based hand rub. In the assessment of the knowledge of the main route of cross contamination and the most frequent source of germs responsible for HCAI, 45.9% and 43.9 % of the respondents respectively answered correctly. The follow-up perception survey conducted among the participants indicates that 63.2% of them admitted that the training/educational activities they participated in were very important to improve their hand hygiene practices.
Conclusion: Hand hygiene campaigns using the WHO tools and methodology can improve hand hygiene knowledge, perception and compliance of the health workers.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The data collected from registered and non-registered users of this journal falls within the scope of the standard functioning of peer-reviewed journals. It includes information that makes communication possible for the editorial process; it is used to informs readers about the authorship and editing of content; it enables collecting aggregated data on readership behaviors, as well as tracking geopolitical and social elements of scholarly communication.
This journal’s editorial team uses this data to guide its work in publishing and improving this journal. Data that will assist in developing this publishing platform may be shared with its developer Public Knowledge Project in an anonymized and aggregated form, with appropriate exceptions such as article metrics. The data will not be sold by this journal or PKP nor will it be used for purposes other than those stated here. The authors published in this journal are responsible for the human subject data that figures in the research reported here.
Those involved in editing this journal seek to be compliant with industry standards for data privacy, including the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) provision for “data subject rights” that include (a) breach notification; (b) right of access; (c) the right to be forgotten; (d) data portability; and (e) privacy by design. The GDPR also allows for the recognition of “the public interest in the availability of the data,” which has a particular saliency for those involved in maintaining, with the greatest integrity possible, the public record of scholarly publishing.
